Performing Rights & PROs
by Amanda Williams
When you write a song, you are really creating intellectual property in the form of a copyright. Copyright protection gives you, the creator/writer, certain exclusive rights. Exclusive means that only you have these rights and no one else. In the United States, no one has permission to use your copyright unless you give it to them in the form of a written license.
The exclusive rights granted the owner of a copyright are: 1) to reproduce the work (make a copy or recording), 2) to make a derivative work (a spoof like Weird Al or Cletus T Judd), 3) to distribute the work (give it away or sell it), 4) to perform the work publicly, and in the case of visual artists, 5) to publicly display the work. The performance royalty so often discussed in songwriting circles comes directly from this 4th right, “to perform the work publicly.”
This public performance can take many varied forms. Obviously, any time you pick up a guitar & play your song at a gig, that’s a public performance. But what about if you’re in a crowded restaurant & someone’s cell phone starts blaring a 50 Cent ringtone? Does that count as a public performance?
In order to understand this lucrative aspect of songwriting, let’s start at the beginning. What constitutes a public performance & how do you get paid for it?
A performance is defined by US Copyright Law as follows: “to “perform” a work means to recite, render, play, dance, or act it, either directly or by means of any device or process or, in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to show its images in any sequence or to make the sounds accompanying it audible.”
In plain english, a performance is when you play your song for people, whether live, on TV, over the radio, internet or in a movie. Pretty much any time you can hear music in public, it counts as a public performance.
A performance royalty, or payment, results whenever the copyrighted work is publicly performed. “How is this so?” you may ask. “I don’t pay when I turn on the radio. How can there be a royalty for something that’s free?”
Enter the PROs, the performing rights organizations. Before 1897, copyright protection in the United States was limited to printed music only. Classical composer, Giacomo Puccini is credited as being the catalyst inspiring the establishment of ASCAP in 1914, the first performing rights organization in the US. Puccini had seen the collective power of the performing rights organization in France, and realized that the US should have a similar system of collecting the royalties owed to composers.
Currently, the US is home to three separate performing rights agencies, PROs as they are called in the US industry. These are BMI (Broadcast Music Incorporated), ASCAP (American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers), and SESAC (which used to be an acronym for Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, but now “is simply the name of the company,” according to the website.)
These agencies all have the same purpose: to collect performance royalties on behalf of songwriters & publishers and they all have their own methods of achieving this goal.
Before we get into the differences among these agencies, let’s explore how they are similar:
All PROs require exclusivity, that a writer only sign with one agency during a particular period of time. This policy ensures that copyright owners do not collect double or triple compensation for the same performance.
You can leave your PRO & affiliate with a different one at certain predetermined times every year or two depending on which one you’re with. Each PRO has different sign up/resignation procedures & they are usually fairly stringent. When you affiliate with a PRO, be sure to keep a good record of your sign up date & any codes you are given upon signing. You will need these in the event you wish to change your affiliation at a later date.
Another thing all PROs have in common is that they require the publisher to affiliate with the same PRO as the writer on any compositions in the catalogue. For this reason, all big publishers have company names registered with all three PROs.
Magic Mustang, for example goes by the names: Magic Mustang Songs (BMI), This is Hit (ASCAP) & Legends of Magic Mustang (SESAC). These are all owned and operated by the same parent company, but because they hire staff writers who belong to all three PROs, the publisher must house their publishing share of the copyright in the same PRO catalogue as the writer’s share.
Sony, too has three different publishing company names - more actually, if you count all the European & Asian territories in which they do business.
Ok, so we know that you can only be in one PRO at a time & that your publisher is there with you. What are you doing there? You are transferring your right to collect the royalties generated by public performance of your songs to the PRO. Now it’s their job to make sure you get paid for the performance of your copyright.
How do they do this? All of the PROs issue blanket licenses to venues, restaurants, movie theaters, laundry mats, dentist offices, and any other businesses they hear about who have been playing music for their paying customers.
What’s a blanket license? It’s just what it sounds like, it’s a license that allows the customer to play any and all the songs belonging to the writers & publishers represented by that PRO. You can imagine how hard it would be for each individual copyright owner to go around collecting money for the public performance of his song. Impossible.
The PROs take the money they collect from all these music playing businesses & divide it up among their affiliates. How they do this exactly is a mystery known only by the companies themselves. The efficiency of the PROs relies on two important factors: 1) how they determine which songs were actually played under these blanket licenses, and 2) how much they pay the songwriter/publisher for these performances.
If you’re lucky, your PRO relies mainly on census survey methods, not on sample surveys. The difference is enormous. A census survey is a method of determining which songs are played based on raw data. Technologically, this would be the case when codes imbedded in the recording of the song trigger a digital counting mechanism & the performance is logged in a database for future payment.
A sample survey is a method of determining which songs are played based on extrapolation of collected data. All the songs on a particular radio station are monitored for a period of time & then the data is assumed to be an accurate accounting of all the radio stations of that same type in that area. The sample survey method is still used for tracking radio performance by ASCAP, BMI, & SESAC.
Unlike mechanical royalties, those generated when a copy of a song is bought, either as a download or a physical CD, which have a set royalty amount of 9.1 cents per copy for the copyright owner, performance royalties have no such standard rate.
The amount of money generated from a public performance of a song can vary depending on a variety of factors determined by each individual PRO. Venues are assigned a weight factor based on their capacity. Television shows are assigned weight factors depending on their ratings, the time of day the performance airs, or other criteria. Radio airplay, too is rated according to the station’s market share, time of day of the performance, etc.
It’s one thing for PROs to collect payments from companies, such as radio & TV stations who are used to paying for music & who are part of an industry that understands intellectual property rights. But what about the new chiropractor office down the street? Do you think that guy knows he is supposed to pay for the muzak he’s filtering to his customers? Maybe not.
All PROs have branches of employees whose job it is to get businesses to pay for the music they play to their customers. Some try to educate these business owners about their responsibility to pay for their music. Often, small businesses don’t understand the copyright laws & don’t want to spare the added expense of securing blanket licenses from all three PROs just to play muzak for their customers.
You can imagine, for the small business owner, the PRO reps must seem a little bit like gangsters coming into their shops demanding protection money. Restaurant owners are used to paying for salt & pepper, for napkins & table cloths, but not music.
PRO reps have told me they find businesses are far more likely to keep paying their fees & be happy with their decision to do so if they understand a little bit about the underlying concepts of copyright protection & supporting the copyright owners. Like most of the public, many business owners think the rich celebrities they see singing the songs are the ones who write them. It takes a little insight into the industry to know that is not at all the case & to understand the need to compensate the little guys, the songwriters & independent publishers, for their work.
Now we’ve discussed some of the ways PROs are alike, let’s examine their differences:
ASCAP is the oldest of the three PROs in the US. Established in 1914, ASCAP came along at a time when the music of Irving Berlin & John Philip Sousa was thriving. The only member owned PRO in the US, ASCAP’s board of directors is made up of 12 writers & 12 publishers who are elected every two years by fellow members. The daily operations of the organization are handled by business professionals, presumably hired by the directors.
ASCAP reportedly collects the most royalty money of any of the US PROs due to the volume of work created by their roughly 410,000 members. In order to join ASCAP as a writer, one of your songs must have been commercially recorded, performed in/on an ASCAP sanctioned venue or broadcast medium, or published & released for sale.
BMI’s criteria for joining is much more lenient: if you write or publish songs, you can join. As a result, BMI has more affiliates, roughly 475,000, but doesn’t quite distribute as much royalty money as ASCAP. BMI was founded in 1940 by broadcasters (radio guys) in part to break up the ASCAP monopoly on performing rights collections. Prior to that time, no one was collecting the performance royalties for rock & roll, jazz or other forms of music, as ASCAP was strictly for classical & traditional composers & publishers.
BMI is run by a corporate staff, not by a board of directors/members as is ASCAP. For this reason, BMI is viewed as being the most “corporate” of the three PROs.
BMI is seen as a leader in using technology in the music business. Launched in 1994, BMI dot com was the first music industry web site & among the first 1,000 dot com registrations. Since then, BMI has continually updated their online presence & their online tools available to writers/publishers.
SESAC was founded in New York in 1930. The smallest of the three PROs operating in the United States, SESAC prides itself on the close relationships developed between reps & writers/publishers. The other two PROS operate on a not-for-profit basis, whereas SESAC does keep some of the income they collect as profit. SESAC is also different from the other two PROs in that you must be approved to join, there is no open membership.
One of the most difficult decisions facing any new songwriter is figuring out with which organization to affiliate. It is important to know that all of these organizations conduct workshops, hold showcases & generally help their affiliates get a leg up in the business. You should check out all three websites & set up a meeting with reps from all three before you make your decision.
All three have significant resources that can help you make connections to further your career. You have to make sure the PRO you choose & your rep in particular are willing to help you advance your career by making introductions for you. They can be a very powerful ally in the music business.
The goal for any new affiliate should be determining which one of the big three is best suited to your writing style, personality & career goals. Take your time & pick the best PRO for you. Your PRO affiliation could well be one of the most important & lucrative relationships in your songwriting career.
Showing posts with label copyright. Show all posts
Showing posts with label copyright. Show all posts
Monday, June 27, 2011
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
How is a Gum Ball like a Song?
How Is a Gum Ball Like a Song?
by Amanda Williams
Suppose your favorite restaurant has a bubble gum ball machine by the front door. Every time you leave, you pop a quarter into the machine & out pops a gum ball.
Now suppose there is a man named Herman Smithfield who owns that gum ball machine. Herman is a family man with a wife named Sarah, a son named Norm, a daughter named Kelly & a dog named Rip. He makes a modest living stocking the gum ball machines in town.
Each week, Herman buys a bunch of gum balls at wholesale & then visits all his machines, stocking them with treats. He has learned over the years that he can expect to earn anywhere from $150 to $225 from each of his machines per week. It may not sound like much, but from this money, Herman is able to pay his mortgage, electric & water bills, buy groceries & set a small amount aside for Kelly & Norm’s school fund & his & Sarah’s retirement.
Now imagine that one day someone discovers a tiny button on the side of the machine that you can press to dispense a gum ball without putting in your quarter. It’s not a free gum ball, mind you, because Herman has already paid 2 cents apiece for them, but at least you don’t have to pay for the gum ball anymore. You don’t know Herman or his family, you just see an opportunity to save a quarter. So now, instead of dropping your twenty-five cents into the gum ball machine every time you walk out the door of your favorite restaurant, you just push the button & wallah! a “free gum ball” drops down for you to enjoy.
Word spreads all over town that all you have to do to get a gum ball is push the tiny button on the machine. Everyone is doing it now. No harm, no foul, right? Everybody is doing it! Why pay a quarter for something you can get for free?
What about Herman? At first, he didn’t notice too much. He just thought that gum balls might have gone out of fashion. Then he did a thorough count and realized that he was missing just as many gum balls, but only making a fraction of the profit. After a week or two of only making $75 or so per machine (and some even less), Herman & Norm organized a stake out to figure out the cause of the problem. They sat near the front door of one of the restaurants, pretending to read the newspaper, all the while keeping an eagle eye peeled to see what was going on with the gum ball machine.
Soon enough, they found their answer. The culprit (as we know) was the tiny button! Herman & Norm acted immediately, after all, their family’s livelihood was at stake! They went around to all their gum ball machines & put a piece of duct tape over the tiny button. That should fix it, they thought.
But fix it, they did not. The cat was out of the bag. Everyone was used to getting their gum balls for free now, so someone just pulled off the tape & went back to pushing the button & getting their gum for free. Everyone loves gum balls, after all.
The Smithfields became angry. How dare these townspeople steal their gum balls! They worked hard for the machines! They spent hours checking & stocking each one! They took pride in filling them with the highest quality gum balls, buying the 2 cent ones instead of the 1 cent! And now, these thieves were chewing the hands that fed them! Someone would have to pay for this injustice!
Herman & Norm devised a plan: sue the restaurants who were letting people have their gum balls without paying. The restaurants argued that they couldn’t be responsible for the actions of their customers. They agreed to put up signs to alert everyone that the gum balls were not free & that they should pay their quarters like they used to do. (Yeah, right. The customers disregarded the signs. They hadn’t paid for a gum ball in weeks & weren’t about to start again now.)
What then? Sue the customers themselves! Make an example of someone! Again, Herman & Norm staked out near the front door of a restaurant where one of their machines sat. Sarah & Kelly came along to watch the justice unfold. Herman & Norm had rigged up the tiny button to make a loud buzzing noise when pressed so that everyone in the restaurant would see the thief brought to justice.
They didn’t have to wait long. Little Susie Ann came skipping up to the gum ball machine, her blonde curls bouncing with joy at the thought of maybe getting a pink one! She hadn’t even had to ask her mother for a quarter, because, just like everyone else knew, nobody paid for gum balls anymore.
No sooner had little Susie pressed the tiny button when the alarm sounded & the whole Smithfield family leapt on her! “Stop, thief!” they shouted in unison. “Drop that stolen gum ball!”
In their excitement, little Susie was pushed to the floor. She got a little bit of ketchup on her new dress & a tiny bruise on her left cheek where Kelly accidentally elbowed her. Susie made a terrible poster child for illegal gum ball awareness as her tear stained face was plastered across the cover of the town paper & all over the local news stations. The headlines read: “Small Child Punished for Stealing Gum Balls. $10,000 Fine Levied by Gum Ball Barons.”
This story may sound far fetched, but it is an illustration of the epidemic facing the music business, the wide spread practice of illegal downloading. Just like the Smithfield family in the story, songwriters and independent musicians rely on the few cents they make from selling their recorded music as downloads online. With the internet, it is easier than ever to distribute music to an international audience, but with the benefits of worldwide distribution come the risk of losing all your income to pirates, because it is just as easy to get the same material for free (maybe easier) than it is to pay for it.
Why should consumers be expected to pay their hard earned money on music when everyone is getting it for free?
Here’s why. Let’s say you buy a download for $0.99 on iTunes. iTunes keeps $0.29 to pay the credit card company & themselves leaving $0.70 that is paid to the copyright owner. If you are just the songwriter, guess how much of that $0.70 goes to you? Remember, the songwriter is the creator of the underlying composition, the reason the song is being sung, recorded & released in the first place. The songwriter gets a whopping $0.091 per copy sold. Less than ten cents.
If you are a professional songwriter who is signed to a publishing deal, you can expect even less money because that $0.091 gets split up 50/50 between you and your publisher. Regardless of how many people wrote the song, the amount allotted for the songwriter/publisher share is still $0.091 per copy, so rap songs with 6 writers only get $0.015 apiece (half of that if they are signed to a publishing deal).
I think the reason that most consumers don’t have a problem “stealing” (downloading from sites who don’t charge you) music is because getting music from major label artists for free makes one feel a little bit like Robin Hood. Yeah, he was a thief, but he stole from the rich to give to the poor. Everyone sees the big stars riding around in Bentleys & living in mansions & thinks, “I don’t have a Bentley or a mansion! That person doesn’t need my $0.99 as much as I do. I’ll get the song for free & no one will be hurt.”
What consumers don’t see is the songwriter & his family, counting every $0.091 that comes their way, driving a Hyundai & grocery shopping on double coupon day. Those families are the backbone of the music industry, the under appreciated heart and soul of a dying business. Without them, the music would cease. There would be no “Wind Beneath My Wings” or “16th Avenue” inspiring us to love more freely, to appreciate the little things in life, and to transcend our daily drudgery into the beauty of a well crafted song.
The common misconception among music lovers is that the artist (the guy driving the Bentley) writes all the songs he sings himself. This is not the case. There are countless families who eek out a modest sustenance gathering the crumbs that fall from the plate of these mega stars. Not just the songwriters, but the roadies, the studio engineers, the musicians, the accountants, the business managers, personal managers, on air personalities, make up & wardrobe designers, and the list goes on & on.
Next time you get online searching for that song you can’t get out of your head, know one thing: somebody is counting on that $0.99. It won’t be missed by you in your day to day life, but someone somewhere is counting on that $0.99 turning into hundreds & thousands of dollars that can be used to support their family.
So, what happened to the Smithfields and their gum balls? The choice is up to you, just like the fate of the music industry. Isn’t something that brings you so much joy worth paying a little money for to support the guys and gals who create it? Yeah, the big bad music industry made a fool of itself punishing kids for illegal downloading, but just like the Smithfields, they were at the end of their ropes. If you saw your livelihood threatened by thieves, no matter how well intentioned, you would probably get angry too. Maybe even a little irrational.
Do a songwriter a favor, pay for your music. You’ll get the satisfaction of knowing that you are supporting families just like yours. There’s no need to wait for “the man” or big industry to figure out what to do about the problem of illegal downloading. The cure is obvious - let your friends know what is at stake, the future of real people, families just like yours. Please don’t let the music die or become subsidized by corporate sponsorship. Help the little guy, the indie musician & the songwriter keep his dream alive. Pay for your music & share the word, not the tunes.
PS This work is copyrighted too, but I want you to share it. Please share it with any & everyone.
You can read more articles like this one & support the work by joining the Hillbilly Culture Club @ http://www.hillbillyculture.com
by Amanda Williams
Suppose your favorite restaurant has a bubble gum ball machine by the front door. Every time you leave, you pop a quarter into the machine & out pops a gum ball.
Now suppose there is a man named Herman Smithfield who owns that gum ball machine. Herman is a family man with a wife named Sarah, a son named Norm, a daughter named Kelly & a dog named Rip. He makes a modest living stocking the gum ball machines in town.
Each week, Herman buys a bunch of gum balls at wholesale & then visits all his machines, stocking them with treats. He has learned over the years that he can expect to earn anywhere from $150 to $225 from each of his machines per week. It may not sound like much, but from this money, Herman is able to pay his mortgage, electric & water bills, buy groceries & set a small amount aside for Kelly & Norm’s school fund & his & Sarah’s retirement.
Now imagine that one day someone discovers a tiny button on the side of the machine that you can press to dispense a gum ball without putting in your quarter. It’s not a free gum ball, mind you, because Herman has already paid 2 cents apiece for them, but at least you don’t have to pay for the gum ball anymore. You don’t know Herman or his family, you just see an opportunity to save a quarter. So now, instead of dropping your twenty-five cents into the gum ball machine every time you walk out the door of your favorite restaurant, you just push the button & wallah! a “free gum ball” drops down for you to enjoy.
Word spreads all over town that all you have to do to get a gum ball is push the tiny button on the machine. Everyone is doing it now. No harm, no foul, right? Everybody is doing it! Why pay a quarter for something you can get for free?
What about Herman? At first, he didn’t notice too much. He just thought that gum balls might have gone out of fashion. Then he did a thorough count and realized that he was missing just as many gum balls, but only making a fraction of the profit. After a week or two of only making $75 or so per machine (and some even less), Herman & Norm organized a stake out to figure out the cause of the problem. They sat near the front door of one of the restaurants, pretending to read the newspaper, all the while keeping an eagle eye peeled to see what was going on with the gum ball machine.
Soon enough, they found their answer. The culprit (as we know) was the tiny button! Herman & Norm acted immediately, after all, their family’s livelihood was at stake! They went around to all their gum ball machines & put a piece of duct tape over the tiny button. That should fix it, they thought.
But fix it, they did not. The cat was out of the bag. Everyone was used to getting their gum balls for free now, so someone just pulled off the tape & went back to pushing the button & getting their gum for free. Everyone loves gum balls, after all.
The Smithfields became angry. How dare these townspeople steal their gum balls! They worked hard for the machines! They spent hours checking & stocking each one! They took pride in filling them with the highest quality gum balls, buying the 2 cent ones instead of the 1 cent! And now, these thieves were chewing the hands that fed them! Someone would have to pay for this injustice!
Herman & Norm devised a plan: sue the restaurants who were letting people have their gum balls without paying. The restaurants argued that they couldn’t be responsible for the actions of their customers. They agreed to put up signs to alert everyone that the gum balls were not free & that they should pay their quarters like they used to do. (Yeah, right. The customers disregarded the signs. They hadn’t paid for a gum ball in weeks & weren’t about to start again now.)
What then? Sue the customers themselves! Make an example of someone! Again, Herman & Norm staked out near the front door of a restaurant where one of their machines sat. Sarah & Kelly came along to watch the justice unfold. Herman & Norm had rigged up the tiny button to make a loud buzzing noise when pressed so that everyone in the restaurant would see the thief brought to justice.
They didn’t have to wait long. Little Susie Ann came skipping up to the gum ball machine, her blonde curls bouncing with joy at the thought of maybe getting a pink one! She hadn’t even had to ask her mother for a quarter, because, just like everyone else knew, nobody paid for gum balls anymore.
No sooner had little Susie pressed the tiny button when the alarm sounded & the whole Smithfield family leapt on her! “Stop, thief!” they shouted in unison. “Drop that stolen gum ball!”
In their excitement, little Susie was pushed to the floor. She got a little bit of ketchup on her new dress & a tiny bruise on her left cheek where Kelly accidentally elbowed her. Susie made a terrible poster child for illegal gum ball awareness as her tear stained face was plastered across the cover of the town paper & all over the local news stations. The headlines read: “Small Child Punished for Stealing Gum Balls. $10,000 Fine Levied by Gum Ball Barons.”
This story may sound far fetched, but it is an illustration of the epidemic facing the music business, the wide spread practice of illegal downloading. Just like the Smithfield family in the story, songwriters and independent musicians rely on the few cents they make from selling their recorded music as downloads online. With the internet, it is easier than ever to distribute music to an international audience, but with the benefits of worldwide distribution come the risk of losing all your income to pirates, because it is just as easy to get the same material for free (maybe easier) than it is to pay for it.
Why should consumers be expected to pay their hard earned money on music when everyone is getting it for free?
Here’s why. Let’s say you buy a download for $0.99 on iTunes. iTunes keeps $0.29 to pay the credit card company & themselves leaving $0.70 that is paid to the copyright owner. If you are just the songwriter, guess how much of that $0.70 goes to you? Remember, the songwriter is the creator of the underlying composition, the reason the song is being sung, recorded & released in the first place. The songwriter gets a whopping $0.091 per copy sold. Less than ten cents.
If you are a professional songwriter who is signed to a publishing deal, you can expect even less money because that $0.091 gets split up 50/50 between you and your publisher. Regardless of how many people wrote the song, the amount allotted for the songwriter/publisher share is still $0.091 per copy, so rap songs with 6 writers only get $0.015 apiece (half of that if they are signed to a publishing deal).
I think the reason that most consumers don’t have a problem “stealing” (downloading from sites who don’t charge you) music is because getting music from major label artists for free makes one feel a little bit like Robin Hood. Yeah, he was a thief, but he stole from the rich to give to the poor. Everyone sees the big stars riding around in Bentleys & living in mansions & thinks, “I don’t have a Bentley or a mansion! That person doesn’t need my $0.99 as much as I do. I’ll get the song for free & no one will be hurt.”
What consumers don’t see is the songwriter & his family, counting every $0.091 that comes their way, driving a Hyundai & grocery shopping on double coupon day. Those families are the backbone of the music industry, the under appreciated heart and soul of a dying business. Without them, the music would cease. There would be no “Wind Beneath My Wings” or “16th Avenue” inspiring us to love more freely, to appreciate the little things in life, and to transcend our daily drudgery into the beauty of a well crafted song.
The common misconception among music lovers is that the artist (the guy driving the Bentley) writes all the songs he sings himself. This is not the case. There are countless families who eek out a modest sustenance gathering the crumbs that fall from the plate of these mega stars. Not just the songwriters, but the roadies, the studio engineers, the musicians, the accountants, the business managers, personal managers, on air personalities, make up & wardrobe designers, and the list goes on & on.
Next time you get online searching for that song you can’t get out of your head, know one thing: somebody is counting on that $0.99. It won’t be missed by you in your day to day life, but someone somewhere is counting on that $0.99 turning into hundreds & thousands of dollars that can be used to support their family.
So, what happened to the Smithfields and their gum balls? The choice is up to you, just like the fate of the music industry. Isn’t something that brings you so much joy worth paying a little money for to support the guys and gals who create it? Yeah, the big bad music industry made a fool of itself punishing kids for illegal downloading, but just like the Smithfields, they were at the end of their ropes. If you saw your livelihood threatened by thieves, no matter how well intentioned, you would probably get angry too. Maybe even a little irrational.
Do a songwriter a favor, pay for your music. You’ll get the satisfaction of knowing that you are supporting families just like yours. There’s no need to wait for “the man” or big industry to figure out what to do about the problem of illegal downloading. The cure is obvious - let your friends know what is at stake, the future of real people, families just like yours. Please don’t let the music die or become subsidized by corporate sponsorship. Help the little guy, the indie musician & the songwriter keep his dream alive. Pay for your music & share the word, not the tunes.
PS This work is copyrighted too, but I want you to share it. Please share it with any & everyone.
You can read more articles like this one & support the work by joining the Hillbilly Culture Club @ http://www.hillbillyculture.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
